I don't see a reason why not to also commit critical patches to
5.0.x. I believe we will still have 5.0.6, especially due to the
reference fixes, and who knows if we have security problems, we might
have more in future.
The fact that Jani and you aren't using 5.0 doesn't mean we
can't/shouldn't commit critical fixes.
Anyway, Antony's question was directed at Rasmus, and you're right,
if Rasmus doesn't feel like it, then someone else would have to backport.
At 03:46 AM 10/13/2005, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 13.10.2005 14:14, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> > PHP_5_0 branch is dead as far as most of use are concerned.
> > We're about to release 5.1, not 5.0.x.
>
> I know that we're about to release 5.1, but up to that moment I'd
like to see
> all the patches for HEAD MFH'ed to 5.0 too.
Feel free to backport them ofcourse...
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Zend/PHP Conference & Expo
Power Your Business with PHP
October 18-21, 2005 - San Francisco
http://zend.kbconferences.com/
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
