Hi Marcus, > maybe safe a few keystrokes and go with the suggested *_001 instead or >*_variation1 style. Did you mean that we name the testcases without indicating *variation<count> or you mean, we should name the testcases *variation_001.phpt rather than * variation1.phpt ?
>Either way I hope you continue. If you do we sooner or >later get like 80% coverage - yeah!! Sure :) with Regards, Raghubansh On 10/6/07, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Raghubansh, > > maybe safe a few keystrokes and go with the suggested *_001 instead or > *_variation1 style. Either way I hope you continue. If you do we sooner or > later get like 80% coverage - yeah!! > > marcus > > Friday, October 5, 2007, 8:47:47 PM, you wrote: > > > kraghuba Fri Oct 5 18:47:47 2007 UTC > > > Modified files: > > /php-src/ext/standard/tests/strings nl2br_error.phpt > > nl2br_variation1.phpt > > nl2br_variation2.phpt > > nl2br_variation3.phpt > > nl2br_variation4.phpt > > nl2br_variation5.phpt > > Log: > > New testcases for nl2br() function > > > > > > Best regards, > Marcus > > -- > PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- with Regards, Raghubansh
