Please open a new bug with the details + reproduce script. Thanks.

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Andrey Hristov <p...@hristov.com> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> Antony Dovgal wrote:
>>
>> On 23.04.2010 15:05, Andrey Hristov wrote:
>>>
>>> "The SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file function loads the private key for use
>>> with Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) sessions using a specific context (CTX)
>>> structure."
>>>
>>> However, what gets passed is path to a certificate, not to a private key.
>>> So you reintroduce a bug, that is.
>>
>> AFAIK the certificate may contain several items, including the private
>> key.
>> At least that worked fine for me.
>
> after I checked this matter with a guy who knows a lot more about crypto
> than me, it seems that the pem file can, but not always the case, include
> the private key next to the public key. The original SSL code does not
> support pem files which don't include the private key but the private key is
> separate. Having the private key in a separate file is not a bad decision
> but is not always the case, as we see.
>
> I have prepared a patch that doesn't segfault PHP when bug46127.phpt is ran
> but allows one to use separate public and private key files.
>
> http://hristov.com/tmp/new_ssl_patch.txt
>
>>> And locally I reverted the patch that was reverting my changes, thus
>>> introducing them again, and I got :
>>> Number of tests :   41                38
>>> Tests skipped   :    3 (  7.3%) --------
>>> Tests warned    :    0 (  0.0%) (  0.0%)
>>> Tests failed    :    0 (  0.0%) (  0.0%)
>>> Expected fail   :    0 (  0.0%) (  0.0%)
>>> Tests passed    :   38 ( 92.7%) (100.0%)
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Time taken      :    3 seconds
>>> =====================================================================
>>
>> Oh, nice!
>> Try to run ext/openssl/tests/bug46127.phpt with valgrind now.
>>
>>> So, I am going to revert the revert and reintroduce the code that fixes a
>>> bug.
>>
>> Your fix fixes nothing, please don't reintroduce the segfaults.
>
> My fix fixes the situation described above.
>
>> If you're unable to reproduce them, I'm ready to do it for you:
>> http://pastebin.com/TPCd7WUU
>>
>
> Andrey
>



-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to