Thanks - I believe it is a DNS issue here.
Doug
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 11:50 +1100, JeRRy wrote:
>   <snip>
>   from ping times:
> (localhost while ssh'd into the server and "ping localhost")
> 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.030 ms
> 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.024 ms
> 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms
> 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.022 ms
> 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms</snip>
> 
>      
>   Looks normal!
> 
>   <snip>
> (arping from my internal network to the server in the DMZ by IP 
> address)
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  8.874ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.134ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.135ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.131ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.022ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.057ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.133ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.142ms
>   </snip>
>    
>   hmmm... Interesting results!
> 
>   <snip>
> (arping from my internal network to the server in the DMZ by name)
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.404ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.141ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.155ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.137ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.150ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.139ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.137ms
> Unicast reply from 10.XX.XX.XX [00:0A:F4:F9:C3:00]  1.147ms
>   </snip>
>    
>   Considerbly slow.  
>   
> <snop>
> (ping from outside network on windows pc in cli)
> Reply from 65.5.48.10: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=62
> Reply from 65.5.48.10: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=62
> Reply from 65.5.48.10: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=62
> Reply from 65.5.48.10: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=62
> </snip>
>   Okay,
>    
>   just FYI I pinged this IP, I got INSTANT responses.  I'll try again,....  
> And again had no problems.
>    
>   Are you have any problems loading other pages fast on WINDOWS?
>   
> The domain is www.fpunet.com - the httpd.conf file lists the index.php
> as the first index type and also it is defined that way in the virtual
> server portion of the config.  I have the phpinfo page set as the
> default index right now.  I noticed that "Virtual Directory Support" is
> "disabled".  Could this be the source of my problem?
> Doug
>    
>   I loaded your domain and got a instant reply and loaded the website 
> promply.  Some people fall in the trap and think if hhtpd.conf is right than 
> nothing to worry about.  Which is WRONG!  httpd.conf is not the ONLY file 
> loaded within a server load.  I can go in and hack the hell out of it, and 
> override the index.php config in another file!
>    
>   .htaccess was not made for a waste of space. 
>    
>   Create a .htaccess file, if not already done, point the server to read 
> *.php, *.phps, *.cgi etc... 
>    
>   But that is not your issue.  I think your issue lies with your ISP to be 
> honest.  Loading times vary, why not grab your IP and go to a website that 
> checks how many "hops" before it hits your website, try a few websites.  
> There is many downloads available on this.  Did you know one hop down could 
> cause slow loading times or even a page not loading at all?
>    
>   Again ISP issue.
>    
>   Jerry
> 
> 

-- 
PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to