Well maybe we can have a function with another name? or pass an optional
second argument?
I'm not that sure it's a good thing to break backwards compatibility on
this one although I admit not knowing how many people actually use it. My
guess is that if it's been in a couple of versions of PHP 4 there are at
least a couple of dozen if not more using it.
Andi
At 11:34 PM 2/13/2001 +0100, André Langhorst wrote:
>>This will break backwards compatibility, and I am not really in favor of
>>adding a new param to get_meta_tags in order to include this new
>>functionality, that will just obfuscate the code more than it needs to be.
>>I think we should just change one implementation, to another, better one. I
>>can't imagine that that many people are using this tag often enough to
>>require a huge change in their code.
>
>following your description, that function is really broeken (lack of
>functionality) and thus needs a non-backwards-compatible fix, your fix
>sounds nice indeed
>this function is not widespreadly used I guess
>
>2c
>
>--
>· André Langhorst t: +49 331 5811560 ·
>· [EMAIL PROTECTED] m: +49 173 9558736 ·
>* PHP Quality Assurance http://qa.php.net *
>
>
>--
>PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
