Some of my thoughts:
1. if you change the return value of in_array to return the key, you can get a false 
error
in your if statement, imagine if in_array found the element in key 0? : )
2. I would say that returning a key is a bit more useful then an option that does not 
reset the  internal pointer or not, though I
can see a use of it

I do agree that having too many parameters is a bad thing, but if this is a concern 
what about making another function?

There seems to be a large desire to see the key of  in_array (see the haystack comment 
in docs)

-Jason


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrei Zmievski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "André Langhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "PHP Development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9337 Updated: make in_array return key, if 
searched value was found


On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, André Langhorst wrote:
> > How about using array_keys($array, $value) to find the key?
>
> obviously it is cheaper to let in_array return it and it is more php 4
> stylish, we have booleans, why not use them?
>
> if ($key=in_array()) do_someting_with_key($key);

So, you suggest putting in 4th parameter? Then someone on php-general
suggested a few months ago to put in another parameter that controls
whether in_array() moves internal pointer or not.. Too many parameters.

-Andrei
* Power corrupts. Atomic power corrupts atomically. *

--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to