> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 February 2001 09:52
> To: Hartmut Holzgraefe
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming
>
>
> HH>> RFC: what should their names be in 4.0.5?
> HH>>
> HH>> ( ) stay with ctype_alpha() ...
> HH>> (X) switch to ctype_isalpha() ...
> HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_isalpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases
> HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ...
> HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases
> HH>> ( ) ____________________________________(fill in your idea here)
>
> And add isalpha alias for it.
This is not in line with the other is_* functions. To keep in line with
those I feel whatever we choose it should be ctype_is_* no is* as this is
used to mean a different test (isset) under the variable functions.
James
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
