> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 26 February 2001 09:52
> > To: Hartmut Holzgraefe
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming
> >
> >
> > HH>> RFC: what should their names be in 4.0.5?
> > HH>>
> > HH>> ( ) stay with ctype_alpha() ...
> > HH>> (X) switch to ctype_isalpha() ...
> > HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_isalpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases
> > HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ...
> > HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases
> > HH>> ( ) ____________________________________(fill in your idea here)
> >
> > And add isalpha alias for it.
>
> This is not in line with the other is_* functions. To keep in line with
> those I feel whatever we choose it should be ctype_is_* no is* as this is
> used to mean a different test (isset) under the variable functions.
>
> James
Absolutely, go with ctype_is_*
2c
Marten
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
