At 01:30 AM 3/10/2001 +0100, André Langhorst wrote:
>>There are no static functions in PHP. This syntax is used to call a
>>method of the parent. It can be used to call other methods and thus have
>
>parent::foo();
>If you remember, it has been implemented *after*
>[classname]::[functionname]() ...
I still don't understand what the problem is? What should be documented is
the right way to use these calls.
>>the wrong $this but I wouldn't document it.
>
>can't this be fixed, otherwise if I start documenting :: (however you want
>to call it), I cannot leave it out and since PEAR uses it heavily it has
>to be documented
PEAR relies on the $this being correct even when you call a method which is
not in the current class or in one of its parent classes?
>>In general, I think it's a bad idea to document undocumented features
>>because some of them aren't meant for people to use. The behavior might
>>change in the future.
>
>it's just three features "references inside constructor" (already
>commited), :: (the magical operator ;) ) and php_ticks
Where can I see the documentation? (Any chance you can send it here to save
me the time? :).
We just need to be sure we don't document things which aren't necessarily
supposed to work.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
