On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, [iso-8859-15] Lenar Lõhmus wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, agree, but this change has happend not much time ago, and I think
> > it's one's responsibility to maintain the behavior what it used to
> > be. Even more if the old syntax was generating standard compliant code
> > (and HTML4 is a standard).
>
> This syntax is perfectly html 4.01 (transistional) compliant.
> (Try requesting this link through validator.w3.org:
> http://defiant.jdimedia.nl:7480/php-hacking/php11611.php (only works
> during night hours in GMT)
I just validated this same document with HTML 3.2 and 2.0, still perfectly
compliant. (The file is
http://defiant.jdimedia.nl:7480/php-hacking/php11611b.php) (HTML 2.0
doctype).
regards,
Derick Rethans
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PHP: Scripting the Web - www.php.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SRM: Site Resource Manager - www.vl-srm.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
