It should be fairly easy to support both codebases by just defining the
right things depending on the API_NO. At any rate, whether we call it 4.1
or 4.0.7 doesn't really matter. It had to be done, and would involve the
same kind of issues regardless of the name.
Zeev
At 06:47 02/08/2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>On Thu, 02 Aug 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> > I really wish all these TSRM changes were left for 4.1. There are just
> > way too many functions affected and I guarantee you that all the
> > standalone extensions will be broken because people will not expect such
> > breakage from a point release.
>
>Oh, as an example PHP-GTK v0.1 now has to require latest PHP CVS or
>4.0.7 because of this. Not too good.
>
>-Andrei
>
>"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with each
>other when we're uncool." -- Lester Bangs, from the film 'Almost Famous'
--
Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
