At 18:20 15.08.2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>Is there any reason to have them even exported? I think we can just nuke
>SAPI_API altogether (I could be wrong, we might be referencing them
>somewhere, but I don't think we do)
not sure, but we can add it later if it breaks :)
daniel
>At 17:58 15-08-01, Daniel Beulshausen wrote:
>>hi
>>
>>currently if extensions want to define their own SAPI_POST_*_FUNC (fdf,
>>mbstring) they'll run into trouble, because they are defined as 'SAPI_API
>>void ... my_handler'. this however doesn't work, because you'll need to
>>define SAPI_EXPORTS (to export it) and are thus loosing the
>>sapi_globals_id (which must be imported).
>>nuking SAPI_API from the macro, and using (SAPI_API || PHP_EXT_API)
>>SAPI_POST_*_FUNC would avoid this glitch.
>>anyone objects?
>>
>>daniel
>>
>>/*--
>>daniel beulshausen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>using php on windows? http://www.php4win.de
>>
>>
>>--
>>PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>--
>Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/
/*--
daniel beulshausen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using php on windows? http://www.php4win.de
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
