> > Just to be really picky, but shouldn't these functions be named > > html_doc(), html_doc_file() and domxml_html_dump_mem() ? > > > > I understand that we already have xmldoc(), xmldocfile(), xmltree() and > > even domxml_dumpmem(), but I still think we should stick we the coding > > standards. It is an extra good thing that this extensions is still > > experimental so we don't have to worry about BC that much. > > > > Am I totally off base here ? > > +1 here.
OK. I will change it. And what about changing names of xmldoc(), xmldocfile(), xmltree() and domxml_dumpmem() then? If the code is experimental, it would be only naughty, but not forbidden. Jarek -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
