On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 04:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > > > therefore i wrote 'on its own line'. i suppose heredoc is handled by > > > the scanner, so this should not be a problem. > > It's handled by the scanner indeed > > > > > > > yohgaki: you were talking about reasons and mentioned only one that > > > isn't a reason for me. any other reasons ? > > > > As I mentioned, feel free to write and submit patch :) > > > > PS: You are better to search archive, there were discussion > > regarding heredoc patch. It's not directly related to > > this change, but it may help. The last patch was rejected, > > IIRC. > > It's fairly easy to patch, the question is if we want it. Andi, what's > your statement on this? I don't see why the heredoc label should be on the > first column anyways.
I talked to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this quite some time ago. IIRC, we agreed that <<- heredoc syntax was an acceptable way to handle this. The <<- syntax would work like the same way as <<- in bash. Of course, I never got around to implementing it... :) -- For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/ __ ___ ___ ____ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Zak Greant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB /_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Calgary, Canada <___/ www.mysql.com -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
