On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 04:54:08PM +0100, Edin Kadribasic wrote :
> > > > that does not allow us release unthought things as stable. I hope we
> > can
> > > > agree on the --disable-cli approach for 4.2 and fully integrate CLI
> > into
> > > > 4.3.
> > >
> > > Is it unstable? I was under the impression that we're talking about
> > feature
> > > set.
> > here: stable as in "we have some kind of agenda what CLI does in certain
> > cases". We don't have this right now, so I call it unstable. That
> > regards to the changes that need to be made to make a
> > "real-shell-application" out of CLI, not to CLI in general.
>
> Well I had an agenda for the first release of CLI and the current
> implementation fullfills that agenda. Nobody objected to it until today.
> Therefore I assumed that it was accepted.
The inconsistency was just yet discovered. Free working
volunteers do not have time when you finish somethin for
testing. No response/objections doesn't mean everything is
fine ;-)
Anyway, I hope you can fix the issue witht he maximum
execution time properly.
- Markus
--
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
