Heh, not until some clever brain comes up with a place holder
to leave out optional parameters (I remember some discussions
about it in my dark half of my brain).
- Markus ;)
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 03:22:59PM +0100, Wez Furlong wrote :
> Well, since you cant skip optional parameters, those protos
> are equivalent.
>
> :-)
>
> On 08/04/02, "Jan Lehnardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 13:15:27 +0100
> > "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > proto resource fopen(string filename, string mode
> > > [, bool use_include_path [, resource context]])
> > context is only optional if you use use_include_path in this proto. Is
> > that desired? Don't you mean
> >
> > proto resource fopen(string filename, string mode
> > [, bool use_include_path] [, resource context])
> >
> > Jan
> > --
> > Q: Thank Jan? A: http://geschenke.an.dasmoped.net/
>
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
"Mind if I MFH ?" "What QA did you do on it?" "the usual?" "ah... none :)"
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
