On Sat, 25 May 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 10:20 25/05/2002 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> >Obviously I think msession is pretty good, but SRM works too. Regardless of
> >which, or even either, PHP needs to make an ?enterprise? statement.
That's indeed true. There is some discussion on the php-evang(elism)
mailing list, but it needs to mature a little bit.
> >Marginalizing this capability IMHO is not the right direction, I think there
> >should, in fact, be a stronger push for this sort of capability to be
> >built in by default.
Agree with that too... but if something like this should be
mainstream, all components should in be in the PHP source tree, including the
daemon.
> I agree. I also think that a solution like msession should be pushed
> despite the work on SRM because many PHP programmers will not want to go in
> the SRM direction but will want a plug-and-play solution for the most
> common PHP 2-tier Apache <-> DB solution.
msession is more more specialized for 'sessions' and thus far better for
it than SRM, which is a different thing.
Derick
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHP: Scripting the Web - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All your branches are belong to me!
SRM: Script Running Machine - www.vl-srm.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
