I am talking about the domxml. After thinking about a bit and reading the post from Melvyn, I think that streams might be the way to go, but not quite positive yet.
In a long term sense, I am just not sure how far domxml is going to go; meaning the discussion of the unified xml implementation. I dont know where this stands, though don't see it being rolled out in the immediate future with all that needs to be done, and assume that it will replace domxml. It looks like there will be two tracks here. One maintaining domxml and they other working on the unified implementation. With that in mind, where should the focus of development on domxml be? I would like to see it get out of experimental stage and considered stable. It may not include all the bells and whistles, but at least for the functionality it does support, it is considered solid. Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rob Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Php-Dev List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] filesystem security questions > Are you talking about your own extension or ext/domxml ? I > think (but could be wrong) that sooner or later streams > should be used everyone for consistency. > > - Markus -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
