>I'm conflicted on this one. On the one hand you've got PHP
>somewhat at fault for treating letters as special characters
>(such that 'Z'+1 == 'AA') rather than as their ordinal
>equivalents (such that 'Z'+1 == ord('Z')+1 == 91 == ord('[')
>== '[' ) which IMO is an ugly thing.
I personally like the C-consistency here, at least on this issue.
>On the other hand, while it's inconsistent with C, it's
>perfectly in line with Perl and it's a performance trend which
>is presumably being relied upon by some. I can certainly see
>where such behavior (heretofore unexpected by me) would come
>in handy in fact.
Where possibly would this behavior of 'Z'+1 = 'AA' be useful?
>Against my better judgement, I'm voting to leave the
>interpreter as is and make notes in the documentation to
>clarify behavior.
Given the choice, I'm personally for having single-characters treated as
ordinals when appropiate.
John
>-Pollita
>
>
>
>
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
