On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I think this is one of those exceptions where we should probably not go by > our standard and call the function bcpowmod(). It looks a bit funny that > all of the BC functions don't have underscores but only one does. It'll > probably confuse people more than it helps. > What do you guys think?
I think it's fine to keep it as bcpowmod(), since we'll probably rename functions in the future anyway. -Andrei http://www.gravitonic.com/ * I don't have a solution but I admire the problem. * -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
