Hey,
you're passing dangerous grounds with this email :), and most of these
points were brought up before.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Stephan Seidt wrote:
> I've got some suggestions for zendengine2 (hopefully not too late).
> What about an identificator for destrucotrs in a class like in c++?
> I mean something like this :
>
> <?php
>
> class Foo
> {
> function Foo
> {
> // Constructor
> }
>
> function ~Foo
> {
> // Destructor
> }
> }
We decided to go with __construct and __destruct instead as those make
it much easier to rename classes for example.
> And an idea about cloning of objects..
> What about an operator for doing that ?
>
> $cloned_object = %$object;
$clone = $object->__clone(); already works.
> Last thing would be a possibility for overloading operators.
Not a chance :)
> Where there already discussions about these things?
> I think that would make the sourcecode shorter,
> more understandable and also looking nicer ;)
Nicer is an objective statement, I would call it 'horrible' or
'perlish'. An archive can be found on news.php.net (php.dev) or
http://www.zend.com/lists/engine2/200301/maillist.html
regards,
Derick
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
