I agree with Lukas. I think that the main concern here should be avoiding
that a secretary has any influence over a vote, directly (as a voting
member) or indirectly (as a lead developer of a member project, as stated
elsewhere). I think this should be enough as a limit.
Il giorno venerdì 12 agosto 2016 12:17:59 UTC+2, Lukas Kahwe Smith ha
scritto:
>
>
>
> On 12 Aug 2016, at 12:09, Marc Alexander <marc.ale...@gmail.com
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> Just to clarify (also possibly for others), you're proposing to add these
> two points to the eligibility criteria:
>
> - Contributor to any by-law creation/addition at any phase
> - A current contributor to activities influencing the authority of the
> Secretary role
>
> The first point is rather clear though it might be helpful to also state
> that this does not affect the clarification of the interpretation of bylaws
> as part of the secretaries functions ("Clarifying any interpretation of
> bylaw text").
> I do however think that the second point is too vague. What are activities
> influencing the authority of the Secretary role?
>
>
> I am also not sure if the 2nd point makes sense. In general the acting
> secretaries would have the best understanding of what might need to change
> and what might not work. So not letting then be involved does not make
> sense.
>
> I think Adam your concerns relate more to the fact that you didnt like how
> one secretary interpreted the by laws. Rather than your proposed changes
> (especially #2) I think you should just state your case and ensure other
> people are voted in next time.
>
> regards,
> Lukas
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/7bf140d7-edb8-4f32-8fd4-e3d5729aed50%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
