I'll respond, since I was the first to bring this issue up, in Samantha's nomination thread. I don't personally think it's a good idea, because it puts added pressure on Samantha and Graham. Not because I think they'll be forced to always agree with each other but because they'll be under increased scrutiny. If they're happy to take that pressure on, then that's fine. I'm not about to try and stop them, and I couldn't even if I wanted to.
Let's NOT assume issues where non have been demonstrated. ...Is exactly the argument against preemptive community measures, like codes of conduct. Reacting isn't always the best approach, and often folks want to be more prepared for a situation which is indicative of a potential problem. Still, I don't think this is a big enough issue that I'd pursue any kind of preventative action against one or both of these fantastic people being elected. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/6cb001c9-d07c-44a1-9b19-6673efc53127%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
