I’m interested in PSR-5 because I wrote a static analysis tool called Psalm. Part of that has involves parsing docblocks to extract information that improves its analysis, and it also involves creating new Psalm-specific docblock annotations to convey information the the current PHPDoc standard does not allow (like array<int, string>).
> On Mar 17, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > >> On Friday, March 16, 2018 3:46:17 AM CDT Alessandro Lai wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> we (the secretaries) decided it was time to post a status update for the >> PSR which are pending, as a way to update you members and the whole >> community on our work, and also to start discussion around some PSR that >> need a little more participation. Here it is: > > A request to everyone stepping forward to help out with one WG or another > (thank you!): > > When doing so, please also state explicitly what your relevant background is. > > One of the goals of the working groups is to bring together domain experts > for > that problem space, not just people who think it's cool. Have you experience > in managing security processes for an Open Source project? We definitely > want > your help on PSR-9 and PSR-10! Do you just think that it would be good to > have standards but don't really have any insight into them beyond the casual > user? Please think hard about what you'd be bringing to the table and if > you'd have enough time to commit to it. > > I don't want to dissuade people from getting involved if they're genuinely > interested and have something to add. However, I also want to make sure we > stay focused on the goal of working groups: Bring together the specialists in > that field/topic to come to a consensus that has buy-in from domain experts. > "I think it's important so I'll offer to help as a vote of support" is a > really easy trap to fall into (and I've certainly done so myself on more than > one occasion), but is less helpful in practice than "I've been working/ > researching in this space for a while and I've got experience to share." > > If the latter is the case for you, then please please step forward and say > so. > You're the people we want to hear from. > > --Larry Garfield > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/php-fig/ywaSYo_tXdc/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/2850867.WhT4q5Pu0L%40vulcan. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CFB031D7-4AD5-46B2-8F65-61900CF2247E%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
