php-general Digest 2 May 2008 21:15:37 -0000 Issue 5437
Topics (messages 273801 through 273817):
Re: problem with for loop
273801 by: Peter Ford
273802 by: Craige Leeder
Any Running Simple Ajax Sample for Php
273803 by: Craige Leeder
273816 by: Jon L.
transfer list in textarea to comma delimited string
273804 by: afan pasalic
273805 by: Stut
273806 by: afan pasalic
set_error_handler help
273807 by: Thiago Pojda
273808 by: Richard Heyes
273810 by: Craige Leeder
Assigning functions
273809 by: Philip Thompson
273811 by: Craige Leeder
273812 by: Nathan Nobbe
273813 by: Craige Leeder
273814 by: Nathan Nobbe
273815 by: Nathan Nobbe
273817 by: David Otton
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
Richard Kurth wrote:
Way does my for loop not complete the task if there are 4 emails it only
process 3 emails through the foreach loop if there is 3 it only process 2
# Connect up
$host ="domain.com";
$port ="110";
$mailtype = "pop3";
$mailbox ="INBOX";
$username ="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
$password ="boat1234";
$conn = @imap_open("{" . $host . ":" . $port . "/" . $mailtype .
"/notls}" . $mailbox, $username, $password);
$number=imap_num_msg($conn);
for($i = 1; $i <= $number; $i++) {
$file="C:\web\bouncehandler\eml\em$i";
imap_savebody($conn,$file,$i);
$file=file_get_contents("C:\web\bouncehandler\eml\em$i");
$multiArray = Bouncehandler::get_the_facts($file);
$EMAIL = $the['recipient'];
foreach($multiArray as $the){
switch($the['action']){
case 'failed':
$sql="UPDATE contacts SET emailstatus = 'Fatal-Bounced' WHERE
emailaddress = '$EMAIL'";
mysql_query($sql) or die("Invalid query: " . mysql_error());
break;
case 'transient':
$sql="UPDATE contacts SET emailstatus = 'Bounced' WHERE
emailaddress = '$EMAIL'";
mysql_query($sql) or die("Invalid query: " . mysql_error());
break;
case 'autoreply':
$sql="UPDATE contacts SET emailstatus = 'Bounced' WHERE
emailaddress = '$EMAIL'";
mysql_query($sql) or die("Invalid query: " . mysql_error());
break;
default:
//don't do anything
break;
}
}
}
I think you need to check the boundary conditions on your loop.
As you write it,
for($i = 1; $i <= $number; $i++)
if $number is 4 then $i will have the values 1,2,3,4.
Perhaps message list is zero-based, and you actually need to count from zero:
for($i = 0; $i < $number; $i++)
so you would get $i to read 0,1,2,3
The manual page doesn't explicitly say the the message number is one-based, and
most real programming languages these days use zero-based arrays...
--
Peter Ford phone: 01580 893333
Developer fax: 01580 893399
Justcroft International Ltd., Staplehurst, Kent
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I think Peter is probably right. In the case he is not however, can
you post a print_r of $multiArray.
- Craige
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Peter Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Richard Kurth wrote:
>
> > Way does my for loop not complete the task if there are 4 emails it only
> process 3 emails through the foreach loop if there is 3 it only process 2
> >
> > # Connect up
> > $host ="domain.com";
> > $port ="110";
> > $mailtype = "pop3";
> > $mailbox ="INBOX";
> > $username ="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
> > $password ="boat1234";
> > $conn = @imap_open("{" . $host . ":" . $port . "/" . $mailtype .
> "/notls}" . $mailbox, $username, $password);
> >
> > $number=imap_num_msg($conn);
> > for($i = 1; $i <= $number; $i++) {
> > $file="C:\web\bouncehandler\eml\em$i";
> > imap_savebody($conn,$file,$i);
> >
> >
> > $file=file_get_contents("C:\web\bouncehandler\eml\em$i");
> > $multiArray = Bouncehandler::get_the_facts($file);
> >
> > $EMAIL = $the['recipient'];
> > foreach($multiArray as $the){
> > switch($the['action']){
> > case 'failed':
> > $sql="UPDATE contacts SET emailstatus = 'Fatal-Bounced' WHERE
> emailaddress = '$EMAIL'";
> > mysql_query($sql) or die("Invalid query: " . mysql_error());
> break;
> > case 'transient':
> > $sql="UPDATE contacts SET emailstatus = 'Bounced' WHERE emailaddress
> = '$EMAIL'";
> > mysql_query($sql) or die("Invalid query: " . mysql_error());
> > break;
> > case 'autoreply':
> > $sql="UPDATE contacts SET emailstatus = 'Bounced' WHERE emailaddress
> = '$EMAIL'";
> > mysql_query($sql) or die("Invalid query: " . mysql_error());
> > break;
> > default:
> > //don't do anything
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
>
> I think you need to check the boundary conditions on your loop.
> As you write it,
>
>
> for($i = 1; $i <= $number; $i++)
>
> if $number is 4 then $i will have the values 1,2,3,4.
>
> Perhaps message list is zero-based, and you actually need to count from
> zero:
>
> for($i = 0; $i < $number; $i++)
>
> so you would get $i to read 0,1,2,3
>
> The manual page doesn't explicitly say the the message number is one-based,
> and most real programming languages these days use zero-based arrays...
>
> --
> Peter Ford phone: 01580 893333
> Developer fax: 01580 893399
> Justcroft International Ltd., Staplehurst, Kent
>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Heysem,
So what you want is an ajax script that will call a php page every
minute, and check for a result (assuming boolean) of 1 or 0? That
shouldn't be too hard. First, I need to know more information about
the page, such as the id tag of the element you want updated, and how
severe the change. If it's a simple word, it's easy to do.
If you could post more information (and possible what you have tried
already, and maybe we can just fix that), I should be able to help you
out more.
Regards,
- Craige
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Heysem KAYA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to check each minute whether the user credit is finished and
> update the relevant place on page. So I have downloaded however was not able
> to run some sample ajax code.
>
> Is there anyone who has such a simple code to implement?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Heysem Kaya
>
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
If you aren't already, I recommend putting to use a JS library with Ajax
support.
Nothing else, they can reduce the browser compatibility overhead coding
you'll need to do.
You can pick any of many, but I'm more familiar with Prototype:
http://prototypejs.org/
## credits.php
--------------------
<?php
/* ... */ // determine value for $credits
print min($credits, 0);
?>
## credits.html
---------------------
<html>
<body>
<div id="credits">Checking credits...</div>
<script src="prototype.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
/*** Reference ***/
//// http://prototypejs.org/api/periodicalExecuter
//// http://prototypejs.org/api/ajax/request
//// http://prototypejs.org/api/element/observe
function creditsCheck(pe) {
new Ajax.Request('foobar.php', {
method: 'get',
parameters: {ts: (new Date()).getTime()}, // cache prevention
onSuccess: function (transport) {
var elem = $('credits');
if (Number(transport.responseText) > 0) {
elem.update('Credits remaining: ' + transport.responseText);
} else {
elem.update('Credits have expired.').setStyle({background:
'#f00'});
pe.stop();
}
},
onFailure: function () {
$('credits').update('Could not determine
credits.').setStyle({background: '#f00'});
}
});
}
document.observe('dom:loaded', function () {
var pe = new PeriodicalExecuter(creditsCheck, 60);
creditsCheck(pe); // first check
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
- Jon L.
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Heysem KAYA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to check each minute whether the user credit is finished and
> update the relevant place on page. So I have downloaded however was not
> able
> to run some sample ajax code.
>
> Is there anyone who has such a simple code to implement?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Heysem Kaya
>
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
hi,
I have one textarea field in a registration form where visitor enters
keywords. even there is a not next to the field "please enter keywords
as comma delimited string", they enter as a list, below each other.
I tried to convert the list into comma delimited string with several
solutions but non of them works:
$keywords = eregi_replace('\n', '.', $keywords);
$keywords = eregi_replace('\r', '.', $keywords);
$keywords = eregi_replace('\n\r', '.', $keywords);
$keywords = eregi_replace('<br>', '.', $keywords);
any help here?
thanks
-afan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2 May 2008, at 16:22, afan pasalic wrote:
I have one textarea field in a registration form where visitor enters
keywords. even there is a not next to the field "please enter keywords
as comma delimited string", they enter as a list, below each other.
I tried to convert the list into comma delimited string with several
solutions but non of them works:
$keywords = eregi_replace('\n', '.', $keywords);
$keywords = eregi_replace('\r', '.', $keywords);
$keywords = eregi_replace('\n\r', '.', $keywords);
$keywords = eregi_replace('<br>', '.', $keywords);
any help here?
1) str_replace is more than capable of doing this in a single
statement - a regex is overkill.
2) You need to use double quotes around escape sequences (\n and \r)
or they'll be ignored.
$replacements = array("\r", "\n", "\n\r", '<br>');
$keywords = str_replace($replacements, '.', $keywords);
-Stut
--
http://stut.net/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Stut wrote:
> On 2 May 2008, at 16:22, afan pasalic wrote:
>> I have one textarea field in a registration form where visitor enters
>> keywords. even there is a not next to the field "please enter keywords
>> as comma delimited string", they enter as a list, below each other.
>>
>> I tried to convert the list into comma delimited string with several
>> solutions but non of them works:
>> $keywords = eregi_replace('\n', '.', $keywords);
>> $keywords = eregi_replace('\r', '.', $keywords);
>> $keywords = eregi_replace('\n\r', '.', $keywords);
>> $keywords = eregi_replace('<br>', '.', $keywords);
>>
>> any help here?
>
> 1) str_replace is more than capable of doing this in a single
> statement - a regex is overkill.
>
> 2) You need to use double quotes around escape sequences (\n and \r)
> or they'll be ignored.
>
> $replacements = array("\r", "\n", "\n\r", '<br>');
> $keywords = str_replace($replacements, '.', $keywords);
>
> -Stut
>
works like a charm!
:D
thanks stut!
-afan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi guys,
I'm trying some custom error handling functions in order to get emails when
fatal errors come up in my production website. The thing is, I went to
phpclasses and there was a good one, but it was a class.
I'm very slow today, so I could not figure out how to get it working. So, I
just removed it from the classs and used the function part. Which worked,
but it got me confused:
Is there any way to use a class to handle errors? I've tried some stuff like
set_error_handler("Error_Handler::logError" and such, but with no luck.
Any hints?
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Is there any way to use a class to handle errors? I've tried some stuff like
set_error_handler("Error_Handler::logError" and such, but with no luck.
It accepts a "callback type, which is a pseudo type. Basically an array
containg the object and the method to use. Eg.
$obj = new ErrorHandlingObject();
set_error_handler(array($obj, 'myMethod'));
--
Richard Heyes
+----------------------------------------+
| Access SSH with a Windows mapped drive |
| http://www.phpguru.org/sftpdrive |
+----------------------------------------+
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I beleive you can also do
set_error_handler(array('classname', 'myMethod'));
for static methods.
- Craige
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to use a class to handle errors? I've tried some stuff
> like
> > set_error_handler("Error_Handler::logError" and such, but with no luck.
> >
>
> It accepts a "callback type, which is a pseudo type. Basically an array
> containg the object and the method to use. Eg.
>
> $obj = new ErrorHandlingObject();
> set_error_handler(array($obj, 'myMethod'));
>
> --
> Richard Heyes
>
> +----------------------------------------+
> | Access SSH with a Windows mapped drive |
> | http://www.phpguru.org/sftpdrive |
> +----------------------------------------+
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all. I have several classes. Within each class, a new class is
called. Is there a way to assign a function in a *deeper* class to be
called in the first class? Example to follow......
<?php
class A {
function __construct () {
$this->b = new B ();
// I want to do the following. This does not work, of course.
$this->doSomething = $this->b->c->doSomething;
}
}
class B {
function __construct () {
$this->c = new C ();
}
}
class C {
function __construct () { }
function doSomething () { echo "¡Hi!"; }
}
$a = new A ();
// Instead of doing this,
$a->b->c->doSomething();
// I want to do this.
$a->doSomething(); // ¡Hi!
?>
Basically, it's just to shorten the line to access a particular
function. But, is it possible?!
Thanks,
~Philip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Philip
First thing first: design patterns are your friend. A good reference
for which, is:
http://www.fluffycat.com/PHP-Design-Patterns/
Second of all. What is the situation in which you are trying to do
this? I can't really think of one where you would do such a thing.
- Craige
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Philip Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all. I have several classes. Within each class, a new class is called. Is
> there a way to assign a function in a *deeper* class to be called in the
> first class? Example to follow......
>
> <?php
> class A {
> function __construct () {
> $this->b = new B ();
> // I want to do the following. This does not work, of course.
> $this->doSomething = $this->b->c->doSomething;
> }
> }
>
> class B {
> function __construct () {
> $this->c = new C ();
> }
> }
>
> class C {
> function __construct () { }
> function doSomething () { echo "¡Hi!"; }
> }
>
> $a = new A ();
> // Instead of doing this,
> $a->b->c->doSomething();
>
> // I want to do this.
> $a->doSomething(); // ¡Hi!
> ?>
>
> Basically, it's just to shorten the line to access a particular function.
> But, is it possible?!
>
> Thanks,
> ~Philip
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Philip Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all. I have several classes. Within each class, a new class is called.
> Is there a way to assign a function in a *deeper* class to be called in the
> first class? Example to follow......
>
> <?php
> class A {
> function __construct () {
> $this->b = new B ();
> // I want to do the following. This does not work, of course.
> $this->doSomething = $this->b->c->doSomething;
> }
> }
>
> class B {
> function __construct () {
> $this->c = new C ();
> }
> }
>
> class C {
> function __construct () { }
> function doSomething () { echo "¡Hi!"; }
> }
>
> $a = new A ();
> // Instead of doing this,
> $a->b->c->doSomething();
>
> // I want to do this.
> $a->doSomething(); // ¡Hi!
> ?>
>
> Basically, it's just to shorten the line to access a particular function.
> But, is it possible?!
i cant remember what the term is for it phillip (ill look later), but thats
sort of considered a bad practice.. primarily since c is composed by b and
a doesnt really know about it, then the way a should talk to c is through
b. so i would create a wrapper method in b (you have many implementation
options here) as a simple example something like this
class B {
//...
function doSomething() {
return $this->c->doSomething();
}
}
which allows you this in A instances
$this->b->doSomething();
this is the preferred approach, since A and C instances are loosely coupled.
of course, if you wanted a to 'know' about c then you could do something
like this,
class B {
// ..
function getC() {
return $this->c;
}
}
giving you the ability to do this in A instances
$this->b->getC()->doSomething();
of course now A's knows about C's and your system is more tightly coupled.
-nathan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
ons here) as a simple example something like this
>
> class B {
> //...
> function doSomething() {
> return $this->c->doSomething();
> }
> }
>
> which allows you this in A instances
>
> $this->b->doSomething();
>
> this is the preferred approach, since A and C instances are loosely coupled.
>
> of course, if you wanted a to 'know' about c then you could do something
> like this,
>
> class B {
> // ..
> function getC() {
> return $this->c;
> }
> }
>
> giving you the ability to do this in A instances
>
> $this->b->getC()->doSomething();
>
> of course now A's knows about C's and your system is more tightly coupled.
>
> -nathan
>
Why don't you just do a registry pattern instance then? IE:
class Registry
{
private satic objs;
public function __construct()
{
self::$objs = function_get_args();
}
public static function __get($obj)
{
return self::$objs[$obj];
}
}
class A
{
...
}
class B
{
...
}
$reg = new Registry( new A(), new B());
Now A and B can access each other through Registry::A and Registry::B
(that code may not function. It's just a general example)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Craige Leeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ons here) as a simple example something like this
> >
> > class B {
> > //...
> > function doSomething() {
> > return $this->c->doSomething();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > which allows you this in A instances
> >
> > $this->b->doSomething();
> >
> > this is the preferred approach, since A and C instances are loosely
> coupled.
> >
> > of course, if you wanted a to 'know' about c then you could do something
> > like this,
> >
> > class B {
> > // ..
> > function getC() {
> > return $this->c;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > giving you the ability to do this in A instances
> >
> > $this->b->getC()->doSomething();
> >
> > of course now A's knows about C's and your system is more tightly
> coupled.
> >
> > -nathan
> >
>
> Why don't you just do a registry pattern instance then? IE:
>
> class Registry
> {
> private satic objs;
>
> public function __construct()
> {
>
> self::$objs = function_get_args();
> }
>
> public static function __get($obj)
> {
> return self::$objs[$obj];
> }
> }
>
> class A
> {
> ...
> }
>
> class B
> {
> ...
> }
>
> $reg = new Registry( new A(), new B());
>
> Now A and B can access each other through Registry::A and Registry::B
>
> (that code may not function. It's just a general example)
that seems like overkill to me, and anyway, A instances need to get at C
instances.. the Registry would need to be globally available and even then,
if C's and A's could talk to each other through it, it still presents the
issue where A instances know about C instances. its a design decision to be
sure, but likely the cleanest solution will have A instances not knowing
about C instances.
-nathan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Philip Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all. I have several classes. Within each class, a new class is called.
>> Is there a way to assign a function in a *deeper* class to be called in the
>> first class? Example to follow......
>>
>> <?php
>> class A {
>> function __construct () {
>> $this->b = new B ();
>> // I want to do the following. This does not work, of course.
>> $this->doSomething = $this->b->c->doSomething;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> class B {
>> function __construct () {
>> $this->c = new C ();
>> }
>> }
>>
>> class C {
>> function __construct () { }
>> function doSomething () { echo "¡Hi!"; }
>> }
>>
>> $a = new A ();
>> // Instead of doing this,
>> $a->b->c->doSomething();
>>
>> // I want to do this.
>> $a->doSomething(); // ¡Hi!
>> ?>
>>
>> Basically, it's just to shorten the line to access a particular function.
>> But, is it possible?!
>
>
> i cant remember what the term is for it phillip (ill look later)
>
i remember what it is know; the principal of least knowledge ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Demeter
-nathan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
2008/5/2 Philip Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all. I have several classes. Within each class, a new class is called. Is
> there a way to assign a function in a *deeper* class to be called in the
> first class? Example to follow......
>
> <?php
> class A {
> function __construct () {
> $this->b = new B ();
> // I want to do the following. This does not work, of course.
> $this->doSomething = $this->b->c->doSomething;
> }
> }
>
> class B {
> function __construct () {
> $this->c = new C ();
> }
> }
>
> class C {
> function __construct () { }
> function doSomething () { echo "¡Hi!"; }
> }
>
> $a = new A ();
> // Instead of doing this,
> $a->b->c->doSomething();
>
> // I want to do this.
> $a->doSomething(); // ¡Hi!
> ?>
>
> Basically, it's just to shorten the line to access a particular function..
> But, is it possible?!
Inheritance - http://uk.php.net/extends
class A {
function methodOfA() {}
}
class B extends A {}
B::methodOfA();
(use sparingly - too much inheritance results in a tightly-coupled
hierarchy of classes, which are brittle and hard to re-use).
Or simply express the method in the interface of the exposed class:
class A {
function methodOfA() {}
}
class B {
function methodOfA() {
A::methodOfA();
}
}
b::methodOfA();
--- End Message ---
