HAH! I love it! -Shawn
"Evan Nemerson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Clode? I like it. Really, who wants to say "closing php tag", "terminating php > tag", or whatever you say. Why not start calling it a clode? What does > everyone else think? > > The only issue is if a "closing php tag" (or should it be a more general > "closing tag", with php being able to serve as a modifier when required, ie > "php clode") is a clode, would an "opening [php] tag" be an ode? > > Comments? > > > > > On Wednesday 04 June 2003 12:47 pm, Christian Ista wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Look the code below. Is it an obligation to multiply the number of <?php > > ?>. There is no other way ? not possible to use only an open php tag > > (<?php) and a clode php tag (?>) ? > > > > Christian, > > > > > > <?php > > switch($constant_lastupdate[$i][3]){ > > case '1' :?> > > <img src="design/logo_windows.gif" alt="" width="12" height="10" > > border="0"> > > <?php > > break; > > case '2' :?> > > <img src="design/logo_mac.gif" alt="" width="10" height="10" > > border="0"> <?php > > break; > > case '3' :?> > > <img src="design/logo_linux.gif" alt="" width="9" height="11" > > border="0"> > > <?php > > break; > > } > > ?> > > -- > "Two hands working can do more than a thousand clasped in prayer." > > -Unknown > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
