On Jul 3, 2003, "Jason Wong" claimed that: |On Thursday 03 July 2003 19:48, Christian Wach wrote: | |> Just to chime in on the "reply to" thread earlier, Daryl, by hitting "reply |> all" has now sent his email address to these 401 scamsters as well as the |> list. Hopefully he'll not suffer any consequences from doing this, but the |> risk is there. | |A decent mail client would allow you to at least: | | reply (to sender) | reply (to list) | reply to all (which means sender, and anyone else on the To: and Cc: fields) | |> Guess which side of the header-munging debate I sympathise with... | |It's a short-coming of your mail client, not the list -- guess which one |should be changed? |
Should people bend to the technology they use, or should the technology be manipulated to do the people's bidding? Jeff -- Registered Linux user #304026. "lynx -source http://jharris.rallycentral.us/jharris.asc | gpg --import" Key fingerprint = 52FC 20BD 025A 8C13 5FC6 68C6 9CF9 46C2 B089 0FED Responses to this message should conform to RFC 1855. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
