Thanks Justin, actually I was also thinking of the same, but just wanted to
confirm that it is really not a good idea.

Was also wondering if there is any third party solution ?.

Regards
Manisha


"Justin French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This first rule is never trust the client-side.
> The second rule is never trust the client-side.
>
> This means that relying on...
> a) the user accepting the cookie
> b) the user always using the same computer
> c) the user not deleting the cookie
> ... is a BAD idea.
>
> Frankly, if you force me to use a single computer to access your site,
> I'll just leave and never return.  I have 3 desktops and a laptop, all
> of which I use at different times.  Telling me I can only use one of
> them to access your site is like telling me I have to be wearing green
> socks whilst visiting your site.  It should be about MY preference, not
> yours.
>
> Likewise, you can't tie a member to a mac address, or to an IP address.
>
> I don't really have a solution to your problem, and anything you DO
> implement will be a pain in the arse to users (otherwise Amazon et al
> would have already implemented it), but here's some thought starters\
> -- all of which are deterrents NOT solutions.
>
> 1.  Make sure that a user can't login from two different places at
> once, if the user does, generate an email report of the problem, so
> that you can keep an eye on users who might be abusing the system.
>
> 2.  Randomly ask the user an additional question on login (DOB, pet's
> name, shoe size, postcode, etc) and compare it to Q's asked earlier.
>
> 3.  Tell them repeatedly that sharing a userid/pass is against your
> acceptable terms, and that any members caught doing so will have their
> account closed without refund -- usually the idea of getting caught is
> a good enough deterrent.
>
> 4.  Perhaps implement a rolling password system -- if this thing needs
> to be bullet proof.  Each time they login, or once a month, or at
> random intervals, you could reset their password.  Again, this ins't a
> solution, but it's a deterrent, because the user would have to keep
> their friends "updated".
>
>
> Most of the above is guaranteed to frustrate users though.  Is your
> site worth enough to your users to frustrate them?  Is the content your
> protecting really that important?  I doubt it :)
>
>
> Justin
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 10, 2003, at 11:44  AM, Manisha Sathe wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a client. He does not want member login by just giving password
> > and
> > login id. He says anybody can give this info to his friend and his
> > friend
> > can access the site.
> >
> > One way is to make use of cookie on his computer. So only from one
> > computer
> > he can access the site. But the thing is that user needs to accept it,
> > and i
> > believe I need to provide some method too in case they delete the
> > cookie.
> >
> > Is there any other solution for this ?  Is there any third party
> > software
> > for this ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Manisha
> >
> > --
> > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses]
> >
> >

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to