"Kim Steinhaug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Often I end up using a "dumb" IF statement which to me seems that
> it could have been done some other way.
>
> Example :
> if(
> ($_GET["id"]==1) or
> ($_GET["mode"]=="home") or
> ((!isset($_GET["item"])) && ($_GET["mode"]=="news"))
> ) {
Wouldn't this be the opposite (just inverting every condition)?:
if(
($_GET["id"]!=1) &&
($_GET["mode"]!="home") &&
((isset($_GET["item"])) || ($_GET["mode"]!="news"))
) {
What do you think?
Regards, Torsten
> // Here we do nothing
> } else {
> // This is where we do it
> }
>
> If we translate the above to simpler reading we could say :
> if(statement)
> // skip
> else
> // Do the stuff
>
> I'm ofcourse looking for this
> if(!statement)
> // Do the stuff
>
> Problem is, when using more statements I never seem to find the
> way of doing it without having an empty {} in it, dont know if you
> see my problem here however, its the best I can exmplain.
>
> For all I know it has to be like this.
>
> --
> --
> Kim Steinhaug
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> There are 10 types of people when it comes to binary numbers:
> those who understand them, and those who don't.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> www.steinhaug.com - www.easywebshop.no - www.webkitpro.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
