Easier to learn than Perl, comparable learning curves with CF imo, probably a bit easier than ASP initially.
Cheaper to deploy than CF since it's free, same for ASP. As for speed in building applications, I'd say that given someone has the same ability in any of the 4 (PHP, ASP, CF, Perl) deployment time is about the same. Maybe a little longer for Perl. All of the 4 languages have plenty of documentation written about them. I do like CF's ability to just name data sources on the server and reference them that way. Think ASP can do the same, not sure. My 2 cents... Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Shiflett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Amanda Hemmerich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 2:39 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP pros and cons > --- Amanda Hemmerich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what do you guys think are some limitations of PHP? > > It's not persistent like ColdFusion. > It doesn't have namespaces. > The object model in PHP 4 is poor. > > I'm sure others can pitch in here. :-) > > Chris > > ===== > Chris Shiflett - http://shiflett.org/ > > PHP Security - O'Reilly > Coming Fall 2004 > HTTP Developer's Handbook - Sams > http://httphandbook.org/ > PHP Community Site > http://phpcommunity.org/ > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
