This is the way that the customer waits to do it. Here is the sample
code that is being included:
<?
print "this is a test2<BR>";
?>
Tim
John Holmes wrote:
From: "Tim Wolgemuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We do have "allow_url_fopen" set to be on. I can not find any docs.
on "allow_burl_fopen". Was that a typo or where can I find info for
that variable?
sorry, that was a typo. Apparently my spell checker thinks "burl" is a
better word than "url". :)
PHP is working fine if we do the includes like this:
include '/somepath/somefile.php';
The URL that we are trying to get to is on the same box. If I am on
that box I can use a text browser to it see the file that I am trying
to include.
So is there any reason you're not using the above method? You realize
that by including it through HTTP, you're only getting the _result_ of
the PHP file? If you're PHP file does not produce any output, maybe
that's the source of this problem...
---John Holmes...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
