To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm
On 25 November 2004 00:47, SED wrote: > Then, shouldn't the owner be able to handle the new directory? > > In my case, the owner creates the directory X but can't create a > subdirectory inside the directory X! nor save a file into it! > > Can you explain that? > > Is the PHP not always running as the same user? Or is it base > on type of the > function? It works like this: (1) Script (owned by you) attempts to access original directory (owned by you, presumably) -- ok. (2) Script (owned by you, but running as Apache user) creates new subdirectory (set to be owned by user *running* the script, i.e. Apache user). (3) Script (owned by you) attempts to access new subdirectory (owned by Apache user) -- denied. So, yes, you can create a directory which it is then impossible to access -- this is an unfortunate side-effect of safe mode when PHP runs as an Apache module and hence as the Apache user. This is why hosted services often use chrooted jails with PHP as a CGI -- the individual copies of PHP then run with the appropriate uids of the host usernames. Cheers! Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Ford, Electronic Information Services Adviser, Learning Support Services, Learning & Information Services, JG125, James Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University, Headingley Campus, LEEDS, LS6 3QS, United Kingdom Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 113 283 2600 extn 4730 Fax: +44 113 283 3211 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php