Ah. I just remembered one reason I had done it involving the art_id field:
I have more publishers in the db than are currently associated with
artworks. I don't want a publisher to appear unless there is at least
one image associated with it. So I did this to avoid having people see a
link to the Sneezy Acres Tribune only to arrive at the next page and
see, "There are no images associated with this publisher."
Jochem Maas wrote:
Jack Jackson wrote:
M. Sokolewicz wrote:
Jack Jackson wrote:
Thanks for all the replies. Jochem, thank you for this code, which
will take me all night to understand (though I bet it works). I also
note that SELECT DISTINCT worked here, too
Also as many of you noticed before me, the art_id was in there as a
fly in the ointment.
by that statement I ment the exact same thing Jochem ment in his 2nd
part; I have NO idea why you're selecting *ANYTHING* from the arts
table... it's *useless* if you don't need the data...
Er, yes, that was what I meant: I had unintentionally included that
bit.Thank you for your help.
Er, Jack - your original query was:
SELECT art.art_id,art.publisher_id,publisher.publisher_name,
FROM art
LEFT JOIN publisher
ON publisher.publisher_id=art.publisher_id
which is a selection on the art table... ( with a typo)
if you did:
SELECT art.publisher_id,publisher.publisher_name
FROM art
LEFT JOIN publisher
ON publisher.publisher_id=art.publisher_id
nothing would change. and if you did:
SELECT publisher.publisher_id,publisher.publisher_name
publisher
i.e. not 'unintentionally' selecting from the arts table.
then you would not have had a problem in the first place?!
I think I'm missing something ;-)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
