On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 02:17, GamblerZG wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:56, GamblerZG wrote: > > > >>Miles Thompson wrote: > >> > >>>You missed the most important: This list works, why break it? > >> > >>Nope, I did not miss it. It's just not a proper reply to the message. I > >>did not suggest to disable mailing lists or change them in any way, so > >>the "break" factor does not apply. > > > > > > Then you suggest fragmenting the list into 3 factions, those who would > > continue to use the list, those who would use the forum, and those who > > would use both. By such a fragmentation of the list, solutions and > > advice would be spread across multiple locations thus diluting the > > efficacy of the list. > > I seriously doubt that giving people a choice over communication methods > would reduce efficiency. It's like saying that having multiple OSes > reduces efficiency of programming.
I didn't use the word efficiency, I used the word efficacy (feel free to look it up). Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------' -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
