On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 20:21, Richard Lynch wrote: > On Tue, November 8, 2005 6:23 pm, Robert Cummings wrote: > > > > I don;t think your the target audience, you don't see the need for OOP > > either :/ > > au contraire! > > I see [have seen] many needs for OOP. > > The largest group of those needs is nowhere near a web-server. I > spent most of a decade writing Lisp code for AI research. You can't > get much more OOP than Common Lisp. Makes PHP's OOP look wimpy. :-) > :-) :-) > > [-- SNIP --]
Ok, that was a good qualification of your stance on web oriented OOP. I must say I generally agree with what you wrote. My biggest peeve with OOP'ers are the ones that think it's ok to retrieve 100 results from a database table, turn those 100 rows into objects, then recursively retrieve the subdata for each of those objects from the database. One site I took over on generated 18000 queries on the home page *shudder*. Fortunately database transfers are pretty zippy when the database is on the same machine, but as we all know, that's not scaleable :) Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------' -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
