Dave M G wrote: > 1. Spamassassin says: > > Spam detection software, running on the system "homebase", has > identified this incoming email as possible spam. [...] > > Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > > I looked up about auto white-lists on the net, and it says that it's a > comparison between the current and previous emails. But for testing > purposes, I don't really want it to compare against previous emails, > since previous test emails would be "spammier" and bias spamassassin > the wrong way. > > How can I compensate for this?
Yup, as you mentioned the AWL (auto-white-list) is a comparison to previous messages. If that is the only rule that gets hit it looks like you are doing pretty good. You did include the body of the message in the test right? Not just the headers? I expected you would have hit more rules than that. Of course, that is an 'out-of-the-box' install of SA, most people have special rules in there, bayes training done, etc... I believe there is also a website that you can copy paste the message into to perform the same test (see message on this list, "Peter Lauri - PHP Mailer and SMTP = SPAM?") That site might have other rules configured (SARE... etc) that you might be hitting. Worth a shot. Travis Doherty -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
