At 3:42 PM -0500 12/12/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Yes, but what if my disorder was random?
How could you prove it is random? Give me an example of something you
can put into disorder that doesn't use the premise of order? For
instance throwing a handful of sand into the air is expected to obey the
establish laws of physics. These laws of physics suggest order in the
universe even when we perceive disorder.
Cheers,
Rob.
Yes, but now we're getting back to artificial rules of the mind. We
perceive the laws of physics to work a certain way because we have
established rules as to how they should work. But, what happens when
they don't work? Then we change the rules. We are now at string
theory and things still remain disordered. All our efforts to put
order to things still fall short.
Also, when we do change our rules, nature hasn't changed. Nature
hasn't suddenly changed to our view, but rather we change our
thinking to adapt to observation. And it's in those terms of
observation that order and disorder of things comes about and not in
nature.
Cheers,
tedd
--
-------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php