On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:43:28 -0500, "Daniel Brown" wrote:
> Is there a specific reason you're using require_once() instead of
> include_once() ? There actually is a difference.... include() and
> include_once() will only include the file if that line of code is
> executed, whereas require() and require_once() will include the file
> even if the line is inside of an if() {} block for which the
> condition(s) are never matched.
Is that still the case?
<http://se2.php.net/manual/en/function.require.php>:
"require() and include() are identical in every way except
how they handle failure."
"Note: Prior to PHP 4.0.2, the following applies: require()
will always attempt to read the target file, even if the
line it's on never executes."
/Nisse
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
