> Personally, I very rarely see the point in using array_key_exists... It's a
> function call and has overhead where as isset() and empty() are language
> constructs and (I would hope) are much more efficient (although I've not done
> any benchmarks)
# i don't know what's wrong with this ..
$foo = array();
$foo['bar'] = null;
if (array_key_exists('bar', $foo)) {
switch ($foo['bar']) {
case true:
//do something
break 1;
default:
//do something else
}
}
# if that's causing more overhead then let me see your benchmark, then
i believe it
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
