On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote: > On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin <ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com> wrote: > > Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by > > multiple e-mail lists? > > It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of > > users just to satisfy a couple of few. > > David was venting based on a discussion in another thread. I'm pretty > sure he knows about the option to reply-all - that's part of the > reason for venting (it sends multiple emails instead of just the one > needed). The optimal scenario is to: 1) be able to quickly respond to > the list, as that's the normal action you want to do and 2) not spam > people with several emails for no reason (i.e. avoid replying to the > OP AND the list). > > -- > <hype> > WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind > Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fake51 > BeWelcome: Fake51 > Couchsurfing: Fake51 > </hype> >
As I mentioned earlier, the Evolution mail client has a reply to list option which I've used to send this to the list. A decent email client *will* have this option somewhere, but if anyone is using one that doesn't, Evolution is available for the majority of operating systems out there. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
