On 16 November 2010 17:25, Hansen, Mike <mike.han...@atmel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hansen, Mike
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:24 AM
>> To: 'Daniel Brown'
>> Subject: RE: [PHP] Why the PEAR hate?
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: paras...@gmail.com [mailto:paras...@gmail.com] On
>> > Behalf Of Daniel Brown
>> >
>> >     Some of the PEAR stuff is older and unmaintained, which is one
>> > possible reason.  More likely is that folks often expect PEAR to be
>> > the end-all, be-all, and that was never the intent.  PEAR
>> is supposed
>> > to jump-start a project and extend some built-in functionality, not
>> > provide a framework or do all of the work for folks who consider
>> > themselves "programmers" because they can iterate an array in just
>> > twenty-seven lines of procedural code.
>> >
>> >     As for folks who say that PEAR and PECL don't work --- the most
>> > common reason for this is user error or system configuration issues.
>> > I've experienced the same issues myself over the years.... quite
>> > frustrating, but sure enough, it was my fault most times.
>> >
>>
> Oops...I just replied to Daniel.
>
> Is PEAR supposed to be the CPAN for PHP, or is there another  repository of 
> PHP modules that is used by the typical PHP developer?

It depends what you want to use.

I use PEAR's Console_CommandLine_Parser and Zend Framework's
autoloader, config and SOAP/WSDL classes.

"Mix'n'match" is the name of the game.







-- 
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE : Zend
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to