Hmm, would this then be a question for internals?

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Ashley Sheridan 
<a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk>wrote:

> "Brad Lorge" <b...@lorge.com.au> wrote:
>
> >Perhaps my question was not as succinct as it could have been.
> >
> >Basically, can you think of a means through which to detect whether or
> >not a
> >variable is currently present in multiple scopes.
> >
> >IE:
> >
> ><?php
> >
> >$bob = "fish";
> >
> >echo is_multiscoped($bob); //False
> >
> >function something()
> >{
> >     echo is_multiscoped($fish); //False
> >     gloabal $bob;
> >     echo is_multiscoped($bob);//True
> >}
> >
> >function getJam($&ref)
> >{
> >    echo is_multiscoped($ref);//True
> >}
> >
> >$jim = "nothing special";
> >
> >echo is_multiscoped($jim); //False
> >
> >getJam($jim);
> >
> >
> >?>
> >
> >On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Brad Lorge [mailto:b...@lorge.com.au]
> >> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 9:53 PM
> >> > To: php-general@lists.php.net
> >> > Subject: [PHP] Detecting Multi-Scope Variables
> >> >
> >> > Hello All,
> >> >
> >> > I am new to the list so please be gentle :)
> >> >
> >> > I am working on a PHP framework and have run up against a
> >functionality
> >> > hurdle which I keep falling at. Basically, I have three mechanisms
> >which
> >> all
> >> > function in a similar way and require this functionality:
> >templating,
> >> event
> >> > handling and "action handling". Within the core code of the
> >application,
> >> as
> >> > is common with many applications with plugin architecture, I pass a
> >> number
> >> > of parameters to functions which have hooked into a particular
> >"event".
> >> Part
> >> > of the mechanism is that parameters can be passed by reference to
> >allow
> >> > for the listeners to make modifications.
> >> >
> >> > $username="bob";$account_type="ISV";$password="fishbum";
> >> >
> >> > register_action_listener('process_user', function($username,
> >> > $account_type, $password){$username.="." . $account_type;} // Or
> >> > whatever
> >> >
> >> > call_action('process_user', &$username, &$account_type,
> >&$password);
> >> > //Result: $username == "bob.ISV"
> >>
> >> I think you meant to use [1].
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Now, what I am trying to do is establish a method to prevent the
> >"hook"
> >> > functions from making changes by reference without reference
> >explicitly
> >> > being passed to them by the calling code.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Perhaps you  should review [2] and see if your logic works with your
> >> 'call_action'.
> >>
> >> > I have thought of a method which simply makes a copy of all the
> >> parameters
> >> > for each listener within call_action(), however what I would really
> >love
> >> is a
> >> > function which returns whether or not the supplied variable is
> >available
> >> in
> >> > multiple scopes or is in the original scope which it was
> >initialized in.
> >> > Does anyone know of a way to achieve this?
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Brad
> >>
> >> Happy coding,
> >> Tommy
> >>
> >> [1] http://php.net/call_user_func
> >> [2] http://php.net/references
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> In more low level languages like C and C++ you could look at the actual
> value of the pointer, I'm not sure that that is available in php.
>
>
> Thanks
> Ash
> http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>

Reply via email to