I rather agree here:
* Beginner * Intermediate * Advanced will make it more sence. A newbie always knows he's notthing else than a beginner, someone who knows PHP but not sure of many silly things knows that in intermediate-categorized FAQs we have most of the answers, and an advanced user is not scared of read the complex programming terminology in the advaced section. Kewl, no? we're getting closer now. Maxim Maletsky Founder, Chief Developer PHPBeginner.com (Where PHP Begins) www.PHPBeginner.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jason Wong writes: > On Thursday 04 April 2002 09:11, J. Scott Johnson wrote: >> One point. Faq items are rated on a 0 to 4 rating expressed as: >> >> Newbie >> Beginner >> Mid Level Geek >> Pro >> Senior DemiGod of PHP >> >> Obviously text can be changed. This way the faq can be sorted section by >> section with more complex stuff at the end. > > Having so many levels seems confusing and cluttered. How would one decide > between "Pro" & "senior DemiGod of PHP"? I would say 3 levels: > > Newbie > Intermediate > Advanced > > are more than enough. > > > > -- > Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.com.hk > > /* > Life is a series of rude awakenings. > -- R.V. Winkle > */ Maxim Maletsky Founder, Chief Developer PHPBeginner.com (Where PHP Begins) www.PHPBeginner.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
