What I mean is, by using functions to do the hard work for you, it is less common to make an obvious mistake. I have a couple of functions that I use in most of my scripts.
eg. securityCheck(); // authenticates the user dbConnect(); // connects to database with default parameters (in config file) $sql = "SELECT * FROM tblName"; $data = GetData($sql, VARIABLES); // grabs data from db and puts in global scope Now if you compare the above code to something which does all that manually, then you'll be typing a heck of an amount. If you have to search through a hundred lines of code, it would be more difficult than searching through 4 lines of code, don't you think? A lot of errors people make are spelling errors. Like so: $ymVar = $_GET['myVar']; or $myVar = $HTTP_POST_VAR[myVar]; Now if you did this: importVars($_POST, 'myVar,foo,bar'); It would be much easier to debug because you only have to look at one line, cause you know the function is working. If you don't see it in that one line, print_r($GLOBALS); might show you if the var is getting transferred, etc. I know what you're saying about confusing code, where you are putting more than one statement in one line is difficult to debug, but thats different from targeting spelling errors. Adam On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 07:57 AM, Sascha Cunz wrote: > Am Samstag, 5. Oktober 2002 20:44 schrieb Adam Royle: >> I very much appreciate the suggestions made by the people on this >> list, >> although for me, when developing, the less typing I have to do, the >> less errors I am bound to come across, and therefore the less >> debugging >> I must do. (Now, doesn't this seem sensible?) > > Well, have you ever read a perl script? :-) > The shortest source is not the best in all cases. Consider, that there > will be > times, you must read the source again - well, the easier it is written > (and > structured), the easier you will see again how it works... > > --Sascha > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
