Tom Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
> Hi,
>
> Thursday, November 7, 2002, 3:45:34 AM, you wrote:
>
> MM> Yet, this is not a such elegant way doing it. It can be helpful in a lot
> MM> of cases, but most often, element key is enough. Try rethinking your
> MM> logic:
>
>
> MM> class Example {
> MM> var $array = array();
>
> MM> function add2array($element_name, $val){
> MM> $this->$array[$element_name] = $val;
> MM> }
>
> MM> }
> MM> $t = new Example();
> $t->>add2array('array1',25);
> $t->>add2array('array2',26);
> $t->>add2array('array3',"Hello");
> MM> echo '<pre>';
> MM> print_r($t);
> MM> echo '</pre>';
>
>
> MM> Cleaner and more scalable, no?
>
> Yes and to fit the original 3 seperate arrays it would be
>
> function add2array($element_name, $val){
> $this->$array[$element_name][] = $val;
> }
No, because you pass it the name and data. This way every name will
become element's name containing the relevant data. Your way just makes
it an associative array without a way of directly accessing it.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
