No the documentaton you are talking about, was that prior to ZE2 people were using underscores to denote private functions/variables. With ZE2, they wouldn't have to.
-----Original Message----- From: Dan Rossi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 12 January 2003 11:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] php5 cvs its cool , i cant remember where i saw the reference , but it was claiming to prefix the functions with underscores to denote private functions in php 4 for the rollover of php5, it was a pretty legit resource i cant remember where though have too many bookmarks, oh well at least i know now , i think it meant to underscore them , to make the private functions recognisable so then the rewrite for the proper OO in php5 can be easy as adding private where the underscores are ??, i gave 5 a test, compiled with no problems except my ming extension didnt seem to load properly so will stick with for 4.3 for now. aparantly its still not true OO as you have to add the constructor of the base class inside the sub class constructor where other languages dont need to do this, i was told from my c++ flatmate of mine but correct me if i'm wrong but sadly i dont know much c++ apart from modding source code now and then :D -----Original Message----- From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 11:13 PM To: electroteque Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] php5 cvs Not sure what you mean by 'changed', but the way to denote private functions is by adding 'private' to the method declaration, and not by prefixing them with _. You can do it using: class bar { private function foo() { ... } ... }; Zeev At 09:43 12/01/2003, electroteque wrote: >hmm has the public and private function accessor changed ? i have been >building my classes with test() and _test() to differentiate from public and >private and have been waiting to try it out but i can still access both ! ?? > >"Electroteque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > lol no , i am gonna try and upgrade my workfrom dinasour php3 to php 4.3, >i > > have a development box here @ home i just upgraded to the 4.3 release from > > rc3 and am gonna try out version 5 then it doesnt matter how stable it is >at > > home really :D > > > > "Danny Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 000b01c2b9d2$ae5e46c0$6400a8c0@DANNYS">news:000b01c2b9d2$ae5e46c0$6400a8c0@DANNYS... > > > It includes the latest CVS build of ZendEngine 2.0 - AFAIK it hasn't >even > > > reached beta status yet, so don't even think about using it for >production > > > work. That said, I didn't have any problems building it and it seems > > pretty > > > stable. > > > > > > A list of changes and features can be found at > > > http://www.php.net/ZEND_CHANGES.txt. > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > Danny. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "electroteque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:50 PM > > > Subject: [PHP] php5 cvs > > > > > > > > > > hi guys just noticed php5 cvs in the snaps page , does this have the > > zend > > > > 2.0 engine ? more specific question has it got the proper OO built in > > yet > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- >PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
