I'm curious.. why is AJAX better than 'straight' JS, but yet CSS is okay? AJAX implies that a request is made to the server for information. Is a request really necessary? If the thumbnails are arranged such that there's a link wrapped around them pointing to the larger image the JS can read this and load the image. And if there's no JS then clicking on it will open the image.
Phill On 09/07/06, Mike Brandonisio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes, CSS or AJAX I feel is better than straight JS. CSS is more > universal though, I think. > > > Sincerely, > Mike ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/HKFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Community email addresses: Post message: php-list@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shortcut URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/php-list Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/php-list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
