php-windows Digest 12 Jul 2009 16:45:26 -0000 Issue 3659
Topics (messages 29470 through 29471):
Re: is ZendStudio IDE necessary????
29470 by: bq777
some PHP extensions unable to load with Apache
29471 by: Murray Eisenberg
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[email protected]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
Stuart you are awesome!
best greats
Alex. Hannel
hahahaha..
scary isn't.. using word as one of tools
yes.. u right.. more editor mean more problem.. but the main problem
isn't what you use.. but what you build..
thx 4 stuart about the response..
I Smile because have this kind of response.. and if this have GRP
system.. i will give you +1
Stuart wrote:
2009/7/6 gunawan <[email protected]>:
i'm not suggested using Arach for php editor.. since i think another
editor
are better.
fyi.. i'm using Arach to html editor
but in med level.. using not only one editor is something u must face
for me.. i'm using a bunch of editor..
that's include image editor and text editor.. this is my full list
* Crimson editor => php editor
* MS Word => template builder??
* Irfanview
* Flash.. image building
* Photoshop => for polish my image.. but irfanview seem better..
since My
work not soo need powerfull
* Filezilla => upload my work
well.. I just want to share.. to inform.. if you want to enter Med
to expert
programer.. u must have a lot tools/editor
and next step is something you must find to enter EXPERT
*that's not scary right?
Word? You're freaking kidding right?
In general I would argue that the tools you use have absolutely no
bearing on what level developer you are, but to be using Word for
anything other than word processing takes a special kind of ignorance
and/or stupidity. It has no place as a development tool unless you're
developing Word macros.
-Stuart
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Upon startup of a localhost Apache HTTPD 2.2.11 under Windows XP Pro SP
3 and with PHP 5.2.10, in the Apache error.log I'm getting a warning
message of the form...
[CODE]PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
'D:\\Server\\PHP\\ext\\xxxxx.dll' - The specified procedure
could not be found.\r\n in Unknown on line 0[/CODE]
....for each of: php_bz2.dll, php_pdo, php_pdo_mysql, php_xmlrpc.
I do [I]not [/I]get any such warning for the several other PHP
extensions that are loaded, such as mysqli.dll. (And that extension is
functioning as expected.)
Each of the corresponding extensions was installed with PHP, and the
dll's are in my PHP\ext directory; php.ini of course includes the
corresponding extension=... statements.
Of course, php.ini of course includes:
[CODE]extension_dir="D:\Server\PHP\ext"[/CODE]
And httpd.conf includes:
[CODE]PHPIniDir "D:/Server/PHP/"
LoadModule php5_module "D:/Server/PHP/php5apache2_2.dll"[/CODE]
My Windows environment variable path includes D:\Server\PHP\ and
D:\Server\PHP\ext at its start.
phpinfo output shows D:\Server\PHP\php.ini -- the one that it should be
finding. And as expected it shows as loaded the modules that are not
generating any warnings, and as not loaded the modules that do generate
the warnings.
I'm running in an administrator account, and there are no permission issues.
In case it's relevant: I have multiple copies of libeay32.dll and
ssleay32.dll in different locations, including a copy of each in
D:\Server\Apache2.2\bin AND in D:\Server\PHP. (There is no copy of
libeay32.dll in C:\Windows\system32, but there is a copy of ssleay32.dll
in C:\Windows\system32\ZoneLabs.)
In D:\Server\Apache2.2\bin, both libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll are
version 0.9.8.9, whereas in D:\Server\PHP they are both version 0.9.8.11.
What's wrong?
--- End Message ---
