On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Damien Seguy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I was reading the pcre.xml part of the doc, I thought it might be more
> convenient to break it into smaller pieces. <literallayout> is not really
> the best tags for such a piece of doc.
>
> I was thinking to break it into refentries, one by major entries :
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.intro">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.meta">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.backslash">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.circudollar">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.dot">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.squarebrackets">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.verticalbar">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.internal_options">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.subpatterns">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.repetitions">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.back_references">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.assertions">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.conditional">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.comments">
> <refentry id="regexp.reference.performances">
>
>
> Of course, there's still some rereading to catch all those <literal>,
> <para>, <simpara> and <lists> and examples too.
>
> Does it sounds ok to anyone?
> Anyone already started the job?
>
> If it sounds ok, I'll give a try on French manual before actually
> messing up the en tree.
You might want to update it from the pcre.txt file that is located in
ext/pcre/pcrelib - that's the latest docs for the bundled version.
-Andrei
