I missed that one. Tnxs for the info, and I will
modify it so you will not need to ;-)
--- Daniel Beckham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is the case, you may want to reword the
> "unset() destroys the
> specified variables and returns true". How can the
> proto say it returns a
> void type, yet the definition says it returns true?
>
> Daniel
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jesus M. Castagnetto"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 12:30 AM
> Subject: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions var.xml
>
>
> > jmcastagnetto Fri Mar 16 22:30:10 2001 EDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> > /phpdoc/en/functions var.xml
> > Log:
> > unset is a construct not a function, removed the
> incorrect (int) return
> >
> >
> > Index: phpdoc/en/functions/var.xml
> > diff -u phpdoc/en/functions/var.xml:1.36
> phpdoc/en/functions/var.xml:1.37
> > --- phpdoc/en/functions/var.xml:1.36 Fri Mar 9
> 07:33:03 2001
> > +++ phpdoc/en/functions/var.xml Fri Mar 16
> 22:30:09 2001
> > @@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@
> > <title>Description</title>
> > <funcsynopsis>
> > <funcprototype>
> > - <funcdef>int
> <function>unset</function></funcdef>
> > + <funcdef>void
> <function>unset</function></funcdef>
> > <paramdef>mixed
> <parameter>var</parameter></paramdef>
> > <paramdef>mixed
>
<parameter><optional>var</optional></parameter></paramdef>
> >
>
<paramdef><parameter><optional>...</optional></parameter></paramdef>
> > @@ -1143,6 +1143,11 @@
> > foo();
> > </programlisting>
> > </informalexample>
> > + </para>
> > + <para>
> > + <note>
> > + <function>unset</function> is a language
> construct.
> > + </note>
> > </para>
> > <para>
> > See also <function>isset</function> and
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
=====
--- Jesus M. Castagnetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
